Provide a concise narrative that clearly states each of (a)–(e) below.
Kusama addresses the absence of a production-grade, real-economic-value environment for testing blockchain upgrades, governance mechanisms, and parachain deployments before those features advance to a mainnet with higher security requirements. Teams deploying on Polkadot need a live, adversarial environment with real financial stakes to expose failure modes that testnets with no economic weight cannot surface. Kusama fills that gap as a canary network, giving developers access to a live relay chain with real validator sets, real staking, and real governance before code reaches Polkadot.
(Source: Kusama Getting Started, Networks)
Kusama's ongoing operation is sustained through three mechanisms: on-chain staking incentives that compensate validators and nominators proportional to KSM staked, a protocol-level treasury that accumulates KSM through transaction fees, slashing, and staking inefficiencies, and treasury referenda that allocate those funds to development, infrastructure, and ecosystem initiatives approved by KSM tokenholders.
(Source: Kusama Inflation Model, Polkadot OpenGov, Treasury)
Kusama is a live, Nominated Proof-of-Stake relay chain with real economic value. It launched in August 2019, started as a Proof-of-Authority network, transitioned to Proof-of-Stake on October 28, 2019, and began parachain slot auctions on June 15, 2021. The network shares nearly the same codebase as Polkadot and is designed to move faster, deploying upgrades and parameter changes ahead of Polkadot to expose defects in a live setting.
(Source: Networks, Kusama Timeline)
KSM is the native token of Kusama. KSM is used for transaction fees, staking to secure the relay chain, participation in on-chain governance via stake-weighted referenda, and the purchase of coretime on the network.
(Source: Kusama Getting Started, Networks)
Kusama is governed entirely by KSM tokenholders through on-chain OpenGov referenda. All protocol changes require stake-weighted referendum passage. Proposals are initiated by the public and proceed through origin- and track-specific flows that define approval thresholds, required deposits, preparation periods, voting periods, confirmation periods, and enactment periods. The Technical Fellowship can authorize the Whitelisted-Caller origin for Root-level calls but cannot execute those calls without a full OpenGov referendum passing.
(Source: Kusama Getting Started, Polkadot OpenGov, OpenGov Origins, Technical Fellowship)
For each existing entity: Labs/DevCo (e.g., Founder, CEO, CTO, COO), Foundation (e.g., President, Executive Director, CFO, COO), and DAO / onchain governance leadership (if applicable) list the: (a) full names, (b) official titles, (c) and prior experience of key team members. For any non-existent entity, explicitly mention it does not exist. External links may be included but they will not factor into the score.
Full Name | Entity | Official Title | Prior Experience |
|---|---|---|---|
Björn Wagner | Labs | CEO of Parity Technologies Limited (confirmed by the October 21, 2022 leadership update, in which he agreed to serve as CEO going forward) | Founder of Parity's Ecosystem Development division, per the same update |
Gavin Wood | Labs | Chief Architect and majority shareholder of Parity Technologies Limited, per the October 21, 2022 leadership update | Co-founder of Ethereum and former CTO; co-founded Parity/EthCore; led Polkadot development with the Parity team |
Fabian Gompf | Foundation | CEO of Web3 Foundation | Previously VP of Ecosystem Development at Parity Technologies; Web3 Foundation states he was key in shaping both Parity Technologies and Polkadot as a network and ecosystem |
Thomas Fecker Boxler | Foundation | CFO and member of Web3 Foundation's Executive Management Team, effective March 1, 2023 | Came from Serpentine Ventures AG as COO/CFO; previously co-founded or scaled a quantitative asset manager, a global macro hedge fund, a digital-asset liquidity provider, and an investment-management boutique |
Gavin Wood | Foundation | Founder of Web3 Foundation and creator of Polkadot and Kusama | Ethereum co-founder and former CTO |
No named DAO executive or fixed on-chain officeholder roster was identified in verified public sources. Kusama governance operates through a public proposal and referendum system organized by origins and tracks, with no appointed officeholder positions. (Source: Polkadot OpenGov, OpenGov Origins) | DAO | ||
Blockworks note: The principal public foundation surface for Kusama is Web3 Foundation (Web 3.0 Technologies Stiftung, Zug, Switzerland). The principal public development-company surface is Parity Technologies Limited (England and Wales). No named DAO executive or fixed on-chain officeholder roster comparable to a corporate management roster exists for Kusama governance. |
Provide a structured description of the DAO's governance, powers, and economic rights. If a DAO does not exist, state so. Address the lettered items below. Even if there is no DAO, there must be an answer to (d).
Web 3.0 Technologies Foundation holds registered trademarks for KUSAMA (U.S. Serial No. 79275219, filed September 17, 2019, covering downloadable computer software for decentralization of internet software protocols) and POLKADOT, among other marks. The polkadot-sdk repository, which contains the Kusama runtime and relay-chain code, is maintained by Parity Technologies under a split license: Substrate Primitives, Frame, and pallets are licensed under Apache 2.0, and the Substrate Client is licensed under GPL v3.0 with a classpath linking exception. The Polkadot/Kusama relay-chain node code is licensed GPL 3.0 only. No public disclosure identifies a formal IP assignment agreement between Web3 Foundation and Parity Technologies or between either entity and the Kusama DAO.
(Source: Kusama Trademark (Justia), polkadot-sdk GitHub, polkadot-sdk Substrate README)
All protocol changes on Kusama require passage of a stake-weighted OpenGov referendum. Proposals are public, and each proposal is routed through an origin and track that determines approval threshold, required deposit, preparation period, decision period, confirmation period, and enactment period. Origins classify proposals by privilege. The Technical Fellowship holds the authority to whitelist calls for the Whitelisted-Caller origin, enabling Root-level execution, but whitelisted proposals must still pass a full OpenGov referendum. Treasury funds are held in a system account that no external key controls; they are accessible only through enacted referendum logic on the relevant treasury track.
(Source: Polkadot OpenGov, OpenGov Origins, Governance Reference, Technical Fellowship, Treasury)
KSM holders can increase their effective voting weight by voluntarily locking tokens under conviction voting, where longer lock durations multiply voting power. Delegation allows a tokenholder to assign their voting power on specified governance tracks to a chosen delegate without surrendering control of the underlying tokens or validator nominations.
(Source: Kusama Getting Started, Polkadot OpenGov, Governance Reference)
KSM holders vote on all referenda governing protocol changes, treasury disbursements, and inflation parameters. Conviction voting allows holders to multiply voting weight by locking tokens for defined periods. Delegation lets holders assign voting power by track to specialists without transferring token custody. KSM holders also earn staking rewards proportional to their participation when staking at or below the ideal staking rate.
(Source: Governance Reference, Polkadot OpenGov, Kusama Getting Started, Networks)
No public mechanism for dissolving or winding up the Kusama DAO has been identified in verified sources. Kusama is a live public network with no designated dissolution authority. KSM holders could theoretically governance-vote to halt the network, but no formal dissolution mechanism, threshold, or legal wrapper has been publicly defined.
For the Primary Foundation do the following independently. If an entity does not exist, state that explicitly. Items (a)–(f) apply only if that entity exists; state explicitly that the entity doesn't exist. Definitions: The primary Foundation and DevCo can be explained as those entities which are directly involved in the issuance of the native token at launch.
Web 3.0 Technologies Foundation is a Swiss foundation (Stiftung) registered in the Canton of Zug under the commercial register as Web 3.0 Technologies Stiftung. The Foundation was established in 2017 in Zug, Switzerland. It employs more than 50 staff and operates across education, governance, ecosystem development and funding, research, marketing, finance, risk and asset management, treasury, security operations, legal, HR, and operations.
(Source: Web3 Foundation Legal Disclosures, Web3 Foundation Annual Report)
Web 3.0 Technologies Foundation holds registered trademarks for KUSAMA (U.S. Serial No. 79275219, filed September 17, 2019), POLKADOT (multiple registrations), W WEB3 FOUNDATION, PARACHAIN, PARATHREAD, and related marks. No public disclosure identifies what software repositories, if any, the Foundation owns as distinct from Parity Technologies, nor whether a formal IP licensing or assignment agreement between the two entities exists in the verified public record. No subsidiary entities of Web3 Foundation have been identified in the verified public record for this filing.
(Source: Web3 Foundation Trademarks (Justia), Web3 Foundation Trademarks (Justia, second filing))
No formal powers over Kusama's on-chain governance, treasury, or token administration have been publicly disclosed for Web3 Foundation. The Foundation participates in the Kusama network as a validator nominator under its Decentralized Nodes program: the Foundation nominates validator stash accounts using Foundation-held tokens, retains all associated voting rights, and may terminate participation without prior notice. All of those nominations and votes are subject to the same OpenGov rules that apply to any other KSM holder.
(Source: Decentralized Nodes Terms)
No public disclosure identifies formal mechanisms by which Web3 Foundation can direct or override Parity Technologies' decision-making. Gavin Wood is the founder of Web3 Foundation and the majority shareholder of Parity Technologies. That common founding relationship creates potential indirect influence, but no contractual control right from the Foundation over the DevCo has been identified in verified sources.
The Foundation's publicly disclosed administrative role in Kusama is limited to validator nominations under the Decentralized Nodes program. The published program terms state that nominations are made at the Foundation's sole discretion, that the Foundation nominates validator stash accounts using Foundation-held tokens, retains all associated voting rights, and may terminate participation without prior notice. No other Kusama contract or on-chain admin powers held by Web3 Foundation have been identified in verified public sources.
(Source: Decentralized Nodes Terms)
Web3 Foundation supports teams and open-source projects through grants, advocacy, research, and governance. Its Decentralized Futures program funds both for-profit and non-profit projects in the Polkadot ecosystem targeting financial self-sustainability. An executed Kusama referendum (Referendum 498) approved a Web3 Foundation commitment to deploy 10 million DOT from its own treasury, over at least two years, for the benefit of the Kusama ecosystem, including transfers to the Kusama on-chain treasury and support for Kusama-based bounties, collectives, and DAOs. Web3 Foundation's CEO publicly confirmed in July 2024 that the Foundation maintains more than five years of financial runway and does not depend on Polkadot or Kusama's on-chain treasury for operational funding. No Kusama-specific contractual payout formula or formal economic right over protocol-controlled resources beyond the Referendum 498 commitment and the Decentralized Nodes program has been identified in verified sources.
(Source: Web3 Foundation Annual Report, Kusama Referendum 498)
Blockworks note: The primary foundation is Web 3.0 Technologies Foundation (operating name: Web3 Foundation), the entity that launched Kusama, conducted the Polkadot pre-sale from which KSM genesis allocations were derived, and holds the KUSAMA trademark.
(Source: Web3 Foundation CEO Appointment, Web3 Foundation Legal Disclosures, Web3 Foundation Annual Report)
For the Primary DevCo do the following independently. If an entity does not exist, state that explicitly. Items (a)–(f) apply only if that entity exists; state explicitly that the entity doesn't exist. Definitions: The primary Foundation and DevCo can be explained as those entities which are directly involved in the issuance of the native token at launch.
Parity Technologies Limited is a private limited company registered in England and Wales under company number 09760015, incorporated September 3, 2015, with registered office at 1 Sans Walk, London, England, EC1R 0LT. The company previously operated under the name ETH CORE LIMITED. Named affiliates listed on the Parity terms page include Parity Technologies Deutschland GmbH, Unstoppable Open Source Technologies Lda, and Parity Technologies Singapore Pte. Ltd.
(Source: Parity Terms, Parity Registry)
The polkadot-sdk GitHub repository, maintained by Parity Technologies under the paritytech organization, contains the Kusama runtime and relay-chain node code. That code is split-licensed: Substrate Primitives, Frame, and pallets are Apache 2.0, while the Substrate Client is GPL v3.0 with a classpath linking exception, and the Polkadot/Kusama relay-chain node is GPL 3.0 only. Copyright headers in the repository identify "Parity Technologies (UK) Ltd." as the copyright holder. No public disclosure identifies whether Parity Technologies holds any registered trademarks for Kusama-related IP; the KUSAMA trademark is held by Web3 Foundation. No formal IP licensing or assignment agreement between Parity Technologies and Web3 Foundation has been identified in the verified public record.
(Source: polkadot-sdk GitHub, polkadot-sdk Substrate README, Web3 Foundation Trademarks (Justia))
No formal on-chain admin powers held by Parity Technologies over Kusama's DAO governance, treasury, or token administration have been identified in verified public sources. Parity participates in Kusama governance as a stakeholder and as the primary code contributor whose releases inform runtime upgrade proposals, but those contributions do not grant Parity any elevated on-chain authority beyond what any KSM holder possesses.
No public disclosure identifies formal mechanisms by which Parity Technologies can direct or override Web3 Foundation decision-making. Gavin Wood holds majority shareholder status and 75% or more of voting rights in Parity Technologies, and he is the founder of Web3 Foundation, creating a common founding relationship but no disclosed contractual control right from the DevCo over the Foundation.
(Source: Parity PSC, Parity Officers)
No Kusama-specific on-chain contract admin powers held by Parity Technologies Limited have been identified in the verified public record. Dr. Gavin James Hoyle is the person with significant control over Parity Technologies Limited at the Companies House registry level, holding 75% or more of shares, 75% or more of voting rights, and the right to appoint or remove directors. Those are corporate governance rights over the DevCo entity, not on-chain admin powers over Kusama.
(Source: Parity PSC, Parity Officers)
No governance-approved, contractual, or programmatic mechanism directing Kusama protocol-controlled resources, treasury assets, fees, or token distributions to Parity Technologies Limited has been identified in verified public sources. Parity's CEO publicly confirmed in July 2024 that Parity Technologies maintains significant financial runway independent of the Polkadot or Kusama on-chain treasury. Parity may submit treasury proposals to Kusama OpenGov for specific development work, as any contributor can under the open governance framework, but no standing contractual or programmatic disbursement arrangement has been publicly disclosed.
(Source: Parity About Us, Web3 Foundation and Parity Dismiss Treasury Fears)
Blockworks note: The primary DevCo is Parity Technologies Limited, which jointly launched Kusama with Web3 Foundation, maintains the polkadot-sdk repository used to run Kusama's runtime and relay chain, and is publicly identified as the driving force behind Polkadot and Kusama's technical progress.
(Source: Parity About Us, Parity Terms, Parity Registry)
Disclose launch and initial supply details in a single initial allocation schedule covering the token's launch.
Kusama launched in August 2019 with an initial genesis supply mirroring the Polkadot DOT genesis allocation. The genesis supply was approximately 10,000,000 KSM. The Kusama genesis block announcement stated it was anticipated there would be 10 million DOTs in the Polkadot genesis block and that the KSM genesis distribution would be exactly as for DOT. The split between locked and unlocked KSM at genesis has not been separately published by Web3 Foundation or Parity Technologies in the verified public record. (Source: Announcing the Kusama Network, Kusama Timeline)
The Kusama genesis distribution mirrored the Polkadot DOT genesis structure. The Polkadot genesis allocation was approximately: 50% (5,000,000 DOT equivalent) to participants in the 2017 public DOT sale via Dutch auction, giving KSM claim rights to those same participants on a 1-for-1 basis; approximately 30% (3,000,000 DOT equivalent) to Web3 Foundation, retained or distributed at its sole discretion and used to fund Kusama and Polkadot development, grants, and research; approximately 11% to further pre-genesis sales and distributions prior to the public mainnet launch; and the remaining ~9% to early contributors and related parties. Separately, 1% of genesis DOT tokens (10,000,000 DOT) was committed by Web3 Foundation for use by the Kusama network, a commitment fulfilled via Referendum 498. One percent of the initial KSM supply was reserved as an incentivization grant for Kusama stakeholders and community; the mechanics of that reservation were not finalized at launch. (Source: Announcing the Kusama Network, Gate.io KSM Listing Notes, Polkadot Forum Genesis Allocation Thread, Kusama Referendum 498)
KSM did not launch with a fixed offering price. The token was distributed through a claim process tied to DOT indicator token holdings and through a Web3 Foundation faucet for recipients who did not hold DOT. The first publicly reported secondary-market open price for KSM was approximately $1.71 in December 2019. (Source: Kriptomat Kusama Overview)
KSM (Source: Kusama Getting Started, Networks)
KSM is an inflationary token with no fixed maximum supply. Inflation is set at 10% annually. The inflation rate splits between stakers and the treasury depending on the ratio of staked KSM to total supply relative to the ideal staking rate. When the staking rate equals the ideal rate (approximately 50% of supply staked), validators receive the full new issuance; above or below that rate, a portion redirects to the treasury. As of era 9394, the total KSM issuance was 18,027,516.981152 KSM. The inflation rate is a governance-adjustable parameter, changeable by on-chain referendum. (Source: Kusama Inflation Model, Chain State Values)
No verified project-issued vesting or release schedule for launch-era KSM recipient categories has been identified in the public record. KSM distributed through the DOT indicator token claim process was delivered to claimants directly at or after genesis with no protocol-level vesting applied. Web3 Foundation's allocation of approximately 30% of the genesis supply was retained at Foundation discretion with no publicly disclosed lock or vesting schedule.
Address each of the following sub-items based on the project's airdrop status. If a sub-item does not apply to the project's situation, state that explicitly.
Planned but not yet executed airdrop: N/A
Executed airdrop: N/A
No airdrop planned or conducted: Kusama has not conducted a separate airdrop program and does not plan to execute one. Token distribution at genesis occurred through a claims process, not an airdrop: participants in the 2017 Polkadot DOT pre-sale who received DOT allocation indicator tokens could claim an equivalent amount of KSM by completing the claims process while connected to the Kusama network. Web3 Foundation also operated a faucet to distribute KSM to participants who did not hold DOT indicator tokens; that faucet has since been decommissioned. Official scam guidance from the project warns that any giveaway messages using DOT or KSM branding are a known scam pattern.
(Source: Claims Guide, Polkadot Claims Process, Polkadot Support Claims Tutorial, Scams)
Projects must disclose all material terms of market-making arrangements that affect token liquidity. If the project has no agreements or deals with market makers, state that explicitly; doing so earns full credit. For each market maker, include in a table:
If the project has no agreements or deals with market makers, state that explicitly; doing so earns full credit. If no native tokens were loaned or allocated to market makers, state that explicitly; cash/fiat retainers or fees are not required for this item.
Blockworks note: Kusama itself has not executed a classic bilateral market-maker agreement.
(Source: Kusama Referendum 477, Kusama Referendum 480, Kusama Referendum 471)
Projects must disclose all material terms of centralized or decentralized exchange listings that affect token liquidity. For each listing, include in a table:
If the project has no agreements or deals with CEX or DEX, state that explicitly; doing so earns full credit; cash/fiat fee amounts are not required for this item.
Blockworks note: No governance-approved, contractual, or project-level CEX or DEX listing agreements have been identified in the verified public record for Kusama. KSM trades on secondary markets under no disclosed project-level listing arrangement.
Disclose all prior token sales by the Project — including fundraising rounds, any material OTC sales to investors, and any discounted market-maker sales. For each sale, provide:
If no prior sales occurred, state that explicitly (e.g., "No prior fundraising, OTC, or discounted MM sales have occurred.").
Blockworks note: (Source: Polkadot Claims Process, Claims Guide, Announcing the Kusama Network, Gate.io KSM Listing Notes, DOT Morph Announcement)
If any, list prior exploits or incidents that directly affected the token, token supply, tokenholder balances, token contract, minting controls, burn mechanics, or custody of token supply. This question is not asking about general protocol, application, or smart contract exploits unless the incident directly affected the native token itself. If no prior incidents, state this explicitly (e.g., "No exploits affecting tokenholders or protocol funds as of YYYY-MM-DD").
Describe material risk factors across the three categories below. Each category includes prompts to address at a minimum.
(a) Regulatory, Legal & Tax Risks — Describe how evolving laws and regulations could affect the project by answering, at a minimum, questions like:
Impact of Regulatory Change on TGE and Listings: (If applicable) How could evolving or conflicting laws and regulations affect your ability to complete the TGE, deliver tokens to purchasers, and list or maintain the token on trading venues in key jurisdictions?
Entity-Level Regulatory Impact: (If applicable) How could regulatory or legal changes impact your core entities (Foundation, DevCo, DAO, affiliated service providers), including enforcement actions, licensing requirements, or forced changes to structure or operations?
Tokenholder Tax Treatment: (If applicable) What uncertainties exist around how tokenholders may be taxed, and make clear that tokenholders are responsible for understanding their own tax obligations?
Jurisdictional & User Access Restrictions: (If applicable) If the project restricts access for certain jurisdictions or user types (e.g., U.S. persons, sanctioned countries, retail vs. professional), what are those restrictions and what risks do they create for users and for the project?
(b) Protocol, Technology & Security Risks — Describe risks to network and contract reliability, correctness, and safety by answering, at a minimum, questions like:
Bugs and Design Flaws: (If applicable) What bugs, design flaws, or implementation errors could exist in your core protocol code, smart contracts, and any bridges, rollups, or oracles that you depend on, and how could these lead to loss of funds or disruption of the protocol?
Security Measures & Their Limitations: (If applicable) What security measures have you taken (audits, formal verification, bug bounties), and what types of failures might these measures still fail to detect or prevent?
(c) Token Economics, Unlocks & Incentive Risks — Describe how the token's economic design and supply schedule could affect holders by answering, at a minimum, questions like:
Critical Economic Assumptions: (If applicable) Which economic assumptions (e.g., staking yields, fee revenue, liquidity incentives, MEV capture, demand for blockspace) are critical for protocol security, utility, and governance, and what happens if those assumptions fail?
Governance Control over Monetary Policy & Rewards: (If applicable) To what extent can governance change monetary policy, fee parameters, or reward allocations (e.g., inflation rate, treasury flows, incentive programs), and how could such changes adversely affect tokenholders?
Web 3.0 Technologies Foundation, registered in the Canton of Zug as Web 3.0 Technologies Stiftung, operates the primary Kusama-facing website and acts as the data controller for ecosystem initiatives related to Polkadot and Kusama. The Foundation's published legal disclosures state that it assumes no liability for the correctness, timeliness, reliability, or completeness of information and that it excludes liability for data transmitted over the internet to the extent permitted by law. Those disclosures reflect the Foundation's active legal, privacy, and data-processing obligations that are subject to Swiss law and, where applicable, to cross-border regulatory requirements in jurisdictions where users access Kusama. Changes to Swiss foundation law, EU data protection regulation, or cross-border AML and securities frameworks could affect Foundation operations, disclosures, or structural obligations.
(Source: Web3 Foundation Legal Disclosures, Kusama Terms, Kusama Privacy Policy)
The DOT token sold in Polkadot's pre-launch period was initially characterized as a security by Web3 Foundation. Web3 Foundation subsequently announced after a process with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that DOT had transformed and was no longer considered a security. KSM, which was distributed proportionally to DOT indicator token holders, has not been the subject of a separate published SEC analysis. The regulatory status of KSM in the United States and other jurisdictions has not been definitively established in the verified public record.
(Source: DOT Morph Announcement)
No Kusama-specific public tax guidance for tokenholders has been published by Web3 Foundation or Parity Technologies. Published legal disclosures state that no information on the relevant sites should be construed as legal or professional advice. KSM tokenholders are responsible for assessing and meeting their own tax obligations in their respective jurisdictions. Staking rewards, governance participation, and secondary-market transactions involving KSM may each carry separate tax treatment depending on the jurisdiction.
(Source: Web3 Foundation Legal Disclosures)
Kusama is an experimental, production-grade network designed to move faster than Polkadot and to carry real economic value. The network's incident history demonstrates that runtime, governance, migration, staking-accounting, and validator-logic defects can cause material disruption on a live, economically active network: a January 2020 runtime error halted the chain and required a rollback; a September 2023 dispute resolution error froze all parachains until governance force_unfroze the chain; a February 2024 disabled-validator dispute bug caused multi-hour finality stalls; a February 2025 staking pallet bug allowed overlapping stake accounting enabling double rewards; a May 2025 validator version mismatch around v2 candidate receipt activation caused an 11-hour finality stall followed by a 23-hour recovery period; an August 2025 parainherent API bug produced a block production stoppage; an October 2025 AHM execution bug caused self-stake to be incorrectly recorded for multiple eras; and an April 2026 proof-verification vulnerability in the BEEFY protocol allowed forged slashing offense reports against Kusama relay-chain validators before the code fix merged.
(Source: Networks, Kusama Timeline, Stalled Parachains Postmortem, Kusama Referendum 263, Kusama Finality Stall Postmortem, Double Staking Reward Bug, Kusama Dispute Storm Postmortem, Kusama Stall Postmortem, Kusama Staking PSA, Asset Hub Migration 2025, Relay Chain Vulnerability Disclosure)
Core Kusama and Polkadot SDK components are covered by the Parity Bug Bounty program. Web3 Foundation engaged Atredis Partners to perform a platform security assessment of the Polkadot runtime. Web3 Foundation's security page states that reported issues may be eligible for rewards at the Foundation's sole and absolute discretion. The Technical Fellowship provides a Whitelisted-Caller path that can accelerate certain high-privilege OpenGov actions while still requiring referendum passage. Validator slashing ranges from 0.01% to 100% of the slashed validator's bond depending on severity, with a 27-day grace period before application. These mechanisms reduce but do not eliminate risk: the incident record confirms that live runtime and validator-behavior failures occurred after code releases and that the April 2026 proof-verification vulnerability remained in production code for approximately 23 months before being disclosed and patched.
(Source: Kusama Bug Bounty, Security Audits, Atredis Security Assessment, Web3 Foundation Security Report, Technical Fellowship, Offenses and Slashes, Kusama Finality Stall Postmortem, Kusama Dispute Storm Postmortem, Relay Chain Vulnerability Disclosure)
KSM inflates at 10% annually. The split between staking rewards and the treasury changes dynamically based on the ratio of staked KSM to total supply versus the ideal staking rate. Keeping tokens unstaked imposes an opportunity cost through dilution. Staking rewards increase when the staking rate is below the ideal rate and decrease when it is above it, creating a feedback mechanism that incentivizes participation near the target rate. If participation falls materially below the ideal rate, a larger share of issuance routes to the treasury rather than to stakers, reducing staker yield and potentially affecting validator economics.
(Source: Kusama Inflation Model)
Inflation and all related monetary parameters are governance-adjustable through stake-weighted referenda. Treasury access requires a successful enacted referendum on the relevant treasury track. Governance-approved changes to inflation, staking economics, or treasury outflows could affect tokenholders in ways the market does not anticipate.
(Source: Kusama Inflation Model, Polkadot OpenGov, Treasury)
Executed governance referenda show direct treasury-funded liquidity engineering around KSM markets. Referendum 477 approved a 50,000 KSM treasury liquidity subsidy for 18 months as base liquidity for the KSM-vKSM pair, repayable with interest. Referenda 471 and 480 document a KSM:dUSD pair arrangement in which Brale committed $300,000 of dUSD and KSM Collective contributed $300,000 of KSM, with one proposed structure directing 50% of LP fees to KSM Collective. These arrangements make KSM market structure partially dependent on treasury decisions, third-party execution, and off-chain fee-sharing agreements.
(Source: Kusama Referendum 477, Kusama Referendum 480, Kusama Referendum 471)
This Token Transparency Filing is provided for general informational purposes only and does not verify or warrant the accuracy of individual answers.