In 2022, Haseeb Qureshi of Dragonfly introduced a now-famous metaphor in his piece Blockchains Are Cities. He compared different Layer-1 (L1) blockchains to distinct cities, shaped by unique architecture, governance philosophies, and cultural identities. While he initially focused on the inevitability of a multichain world, valuation theorists quickly extended his analogy.
They reasoned that if L1s were like cities, then their native tokens served as the local currencies. And just like sovereign currencies, these tokens derive value from economic activity. As a blockchain’s onchain “GDP” grew, so did demand for its token. In this view, markets priced native tokens as monetary assets anchored to their digital jurisdictions.
But markets don’t stand still. Token valuations increasingly suggest that this analogy is breaking down. A bustling digital city is no longer enough. Now, it needs to generate profit. Investors seem to care less about the scale or vibrancy of a blockchain’s economy and more about whether the network can extract and retain value. As a result, valuation frameworks are shifting. Markets appear to be moving away from treating L1s as cities with civic currencies and instead are beginning to assess them more like corporations, platforms with customers, margins, and monetization strategies.
Kinji formerly covered crypto at Morgan Stanley. His primary interests are DeFi, Ponzi's and unstable stablecoins.